Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Vanessa Woodard Byers's avatar

Barney Bishop’s editorial is not the flex that the pro-Marva Johnson camp believes it to be. Instead of strengthening support for her selection, it has galvanized FAMU students, faculty, alumni and supporters to become more vocal in our opposition. His commentary only reinforces longstanding concerns about the questionable motives driving Johnson’s selection and blatant political influence in Florida’s education system. It deepens skepticism toward so-called “FAMU supporters” like Bishop and the nine Florida A&M University Board of Trustees members who approved Johnson’s selection and/or her unreasonable employment compensation contract — Jamal Brown, John Crossman, Natlie G. Figgers, Emery A. Gainey, Deveron Gibbons, Kelvin Lawson, Raphael Vasquez, Nicole Washington, and Michael White.

It’s essential to be aware that Bishop also led unknowing readers to believe he is a Democrat based on his past affiliations and leadership position. Bishop is, in fact, a Republican. His strategic positioning attempts to obscure his current ideological leanings and lend credibility to a deeply unpopular selection to lead Florida A&M.

In truth, Bishop’s involvement doesn’t lend legitimacy to Johnson’s candidacy—it amplifies the very concerns that students, alumni, faculty and supporters have been raising all along.

Expand full comment

No posts